

Feb. 1, 3, 8, and 10, Mock Trial will be participating in the Santa Clara County High School Mock Trial competition. The competition will pit the MVHS team against teams from the rest of the county, all striving for a 4-0 record or 3-1 record, which would place the team in the advanced rounds of the competition. El Estoque chronicles the journey of MVHS Mock Trial as they make their way through the four preliminary rounds.County Competitions: Preliminary Round 4In Mock Trial, two things are certain—experience is the biggest weapon and new teams rarely make quarterfinals.Unfortunately, these generalizations held true during Mock Trial’s final county competition preliminary round on Feb. 10. The MVHS defense lost by 14 points, 169-155, to the Prospect High School prosecution. The round only had two scorers, just like the previous round, since one of the scorers got stuck in an elevator.


County Competitions: Preliminary Round 3After an “excellent” trial, a win is imminent. The judge ruled both the pre-trial motion and the verdict in your favor. But the judge’s opinion doesn’t matter—the two subjective scorers have decided that the other team was better.On Feb. 8, the Mock Trial prosecution team lost 161-153 to the Prospect High School defense team. Although the team won the verdict from the judge, the two scorers gave the round to PHS.The scoring is extremely subjective. All competitors start out with a score of three, which is considered satisfactory. From there, scorers can decide to give the competitor more or less points based on their performance. Usually, three lawyers score Mock Trial competitions; however, there were only two scorers for this round.Both teams ended up receiving the same score of 81 points from one scorer, but another scorer gave the round to PHS, 80-72.Despite the loss, the team performance was strong. Pre-trial lawyer senior Daniel Ki won the pre-trial motion, which kept both the assault with a deadly weapon and cyberbullying count in play. He scored straight fives from the scorers. “Super sophomores” Christie Lin and Leo Zhang temporarily replaced sophomore Fangfei Li as prosecution lawyers. Sophomore Sean Lee, who played Chris Draper, the computer lab teacher at Dunbar Middle, received the score 4-5 for his performance. He was put into this position on Feb. 5, the Saturday before the competition. Sophomore Lucia Dalle Ore was also assigned to her witness position, victim Angel Sterling, on Feb. 5. While on the stand, she started to cry.“I had to cry,” Dalle Ore said. “The way you can tell you’re truly in character is if you could think about the situation and then react. [Sterling] was abused—she had a brick thrown at the back of her head. Of course I was going to cry.”Now a 1-2 team, the MVHS defense team will face the PHS prosecution Feb. 10. If they win, they will still have the chance of advancing to the quarter-final rounds of the competition.Mock Trial’s next competition is Feb. 10, Round 4 of the preliminary competition, against Prospect High School. The competition is open to the public, and will take place at the county’s Superior Court, 191 North First Street in San Jose. Check back on Feb. 11 for the results of the round.

County Competitions: Preliminary Round 2When your team’s record is 0-1 going into the second round of the competition, don’t worry. The super sophomores will save you.And that’s what happened to the Mock Trial’s defense team as they went against Santa Clara High School on Feb. 3. Power duo sophomores Leo Zhang and Mock Trial treasurer Christie Lin, the defense lawyers, and pre-trial lawyer sophomore Sean Lee lead the team to a 12-point victory.“Because we lost the first round, we essentially had to win the second round,” Lin said. “If we lost the second round, it was all over.”As with the prosecution’s competition on Feb. 1, the defense team lost their pre-trial motion. Ideally, the cyberbullying count would have been thrown out, making it easier for the team to defend Jesse Woodson, the defendant, played by senior Daniel Ki. Instead, the cyberbullying count kept, leaving the team to defend Woodson against both the assault with a deadly weapon and cyberbullying counts.Lee scored a 5-3-5 for his pre-trial motion. During the trial, Ki scored a 3-5-5 for his performance as Woodson, sophomore Ankita Tejwani, playing vice principal Sydney Campbell, received a 5-5-4. Lin maxed-out, scoring all fives her her closing arguments. After the trial, the District Attorney, one of the scorers, addressed teams and coaches.“He got up and said, ‘Christie, I think you ought to just graduate from high school, bypass college, go straight to law school, and then come and work for me,’” Mock Trial head coach Jim Torre said. “[Lin] was graceful, confident, at ease, and powerful.”“My first reaction was relief when the District Attorney told me I did a good job,” Lin said, “because that indicated a very possible win for us.”The prosecution team will face the Prospect High School defense on Feb. 8. Torre, who started the PHS Mock Trial team in 1998 and was the coach there for 15 years, knows they are “hungry” for a win. Last year, the team was undefeated in the preliminary rounds, but was defeated in the semi-finals. But he knows MVMT is hungry as well.“The first round our team was a little nervous, and it took a win like this to get their confidence,” Torre said. “They feel armed and dangerous.”Mock Trial’s next competition is Feb. 8, Round 3 of the preliminary competition, against Prospect High School. The competition is open to the public, and will take place at the county’s Superior Court, 191 North First Street in San Jose. Check back on Feb. 9 for the results of the round.
County Competitions: Preliminary Round 1It’s safe to say that Mock Trial will be looking for redemption.
